Thank you for the messages you send me in feed-back to things I post…it’s not always bad to differ on things as long as reasonable dialogue can continue pushing misunderstandings towards understandings. After all, it’s only by questioning that we as human beings are able to arrive at the truth…in addition; it’s something that is highly encouraged. Knowledge gained by your own so journeying is much more valuable than that which is given; for it has been that which was given without question that has mislead the masses of people up to present day… So, this topic I want to discuss is this arising issue mainly among black-Americans’ with the ancient-Israelite declarations, especially now since more and more are coming to the realization of the Wests’ false attributes to Christianity not to mention all the scandals therein. In addition, all the deliberate, and focused violence has also, I believe opened the minds of many provokingly towards re-discovery that was otherwise closed with ignorant bliss before. Looking at just recent history of America post-slavery many waves of political movements have come all trying to re-invigorate the black nation and or unite it. Not politicians themselves, but aligned politically for meeting a particular agenda of re-education and or re-unification the likes of George Washington Carver, W.E.B. Dubois, Fredrick Douglas, Marcus Garvey, Martin Luther King Jr., Huey Newton, & Elijah Muhammad…all such men have published very relevant works towards the POLITICAL issues of the black nation, however each movement has come and gone (with the exception of Elijah’s Nation of Islam movement). Now, it’s my opinion that such movements have come and gone playfully touching on issues without any true force to sustain them; politics is something that is undefined, discrete, and is always aligned to a particular need or want which its speech and mission statement is derived. Politics Is unable to save or even free a people in and of itself…and this is why with each storm advanced by different leaders plateaus of momentum reaching a certain velocity begin to drop off quickly because nothing is gained. Often politics is just a circle-jerk of glorified speech among people who have no intention towards conclusion nor true guidance; or they themselves aren’t sure as to what is supposed to take place afterwards hopingly riding out the wave to see what transpires down the road. Slavery, Distorted history, and divisions have made it virtually impossible for a people to claim their true heritage through lineage, however archaeological finds have made it quite clear that the African presence was well established in the Americas thousands of years before others. Be that as It may…subdued movements became hoarse in voice while blacks were enjoying integration, moving up into middle & celebrity classes all while legislation and drug infestation was killing the infrastructure. Herein lies my proof In fact to political rhetoric aligned to need or want…the acceptance of a small % wiped away an entire movement for justice for ALL. Bought and now loyal to keeping what they have been allowed to obtain, the masses are still mired in ongoing tragic history finding not the means nor the justice sought for prior. The violence of the 1960’s opened the eyes of the lesser generation grouping up, making them activist toward the corruption of injustice by their early twenties and thus spawning such movements through music. Much of the music of the 70’s continuing into the 80's was based on awareness and conscious uplift-ment. Now, again galvanized by more violence that has escalated from the water hose and police dogs to open murder…the political movement is resurfacing. Now, please don’t take me wrong…I completely agree that the activism of politics is needed but only towards argument and dispute towards other corrupt politics…Politics in the form of uniting a people doesn’t work nor should it, because when you understand the nature of politics you will quickly come to the realization to its fundamental flaws. Politics is nothing more than philosophical doctrine that one promotes in a manner that other like-minded individuals align themselves with wanting the same result(s). So therefore it’s only as strong as your need or want and if any part of that group achieves a portion of that result(s) then the group will weaken as those who have gained move away from the force of that movement. These attitudes only satisfy an egotistical or eccentric type attitude. The point of salvation is completely missed. What do I mean by salvation being missed? Well, with all the talk of black Israelite etc. much of history is overlooked as to promote one side of the coin. In addition to that, I have also heard many people questioning if Eesa ibn Mariam a.s. (Jesus) really existed because in every age there is has been an accredited story to his likeness as well as his mother…Well, Eesa ibn Mariam a.s. did exist, just not in the manner that most people have been taught. But figures such as Yacub a.s. (Jacob), Yusuf a.s. (Joseph), Musa a.s. (Moses), Harun a.s.(Aaron), Dawud a.s. (David), Sulaiman a.s (Solomon) aren’t denied. Musa a.s. being the messenger that he was is of the most popular among the Israelites although the lineage name begins with Yacub a.s. (Jacob) who is Israel. Revelation cannot be denied no matter what angle is denied is just do. Revelation confirms succeeded revelation and for those who use the bible as a source of revelation they themselves have to accept succession, which is called Naskh (divine abrogation) . Why? Well, because as i mentioned before the bible houses revelations to multiple prophets...denying the Quran is in fact a denial of all...Other differences were:
The Torah was revealed to Musa a.s. and most people don’t disagree with that. Now this brings us to a critical point of understanding…The Torah today is lost as well as the Gospel, and in particular I will speak directly to the English speaking audience who have questioned me. The Torah was revealed In the language of Musa a.s. and such also was the case with every revelation of Allah to his Nabi/Rasul (prophet/messenger). Therefore, all biblical sources ARE NOT THE WORD OF GOD!!! Allah didn’t reveal translated documents nor a compilation of individual revelation as one book. He revealed these revelations individually and at much different times in history. The the Bible itself should not take on the prefix "holy" nor be held in such regard because it is the complete work of man..., translated documents are the works of man, and although some translations have survived in fragmentation to what the creator or his prophet was saying, the translation was never meant to be the final understanding. The reason for that is because with such strong Semitic language being translated to weaker Latin languages you miss the strength in what is being said and also often there is no direct translation leaving only the best attempt. I have published such statements before and this is always overlooked or disregarded and to be fair to understanding misunderstanding these FACTS have to be considered. Secondly, the laws in language with singular, two, then plural and finally Royal we of Power…these laws have to be followed even in translation or else the meaning is lost. Lastly, the translation and or use of words in English are taken to literal meaning often such as the use of the word “spirit” or “son”…If you read the blog posting that follows this below I have already written in detail about the use of “spirit”. The use of the word son is taken literally to meaning son derived by the action of begotten conception, which is far removed from the creator. Prophets were often called by other names such as :Chosen one, saint, blessed soul or spirit, beloved, messenger (if given a law), Warner, comforter, and giver of glad tidings…these translations in English are again taken literal so if the one who is being referred to by an endeared description isn’t referred to by name English speaking folk miss the meaning completely. These are just a few problems, which the latter is one of significance and brings me to my point about salvation. So much time is spent on educating the people about lost history, which has its place, but no efforts are done on disseminating the truth about what I have mentioned about scripture, and thus a very important part is thereby missed. Of course, without being naive about the matter much of this crucial misunderstanding is initial, but nonetheless the proof is there with biblical scholars and the likes. The proof is also still there within the bible itself…Scribes often interjecting their own thoughts or interpretations not versed in Semitic language completely overlooked the ancient names of people, places etc. and therefore the confirming facts Allah has also preserved for people who are truly in search for the truth. Acceptance of the truth when it is found or put forth seems to be another major obstacle for many. Research doesn’t involve watching a couple short lectures on a particular topic that seems to appeal to your liking; instead its digging deep into the facts one by one to the discovery of is source, and that source is of undeniable truth. Robust from any angle, answers all its questions in defending itself, easy to understand when explained, and withstanding any criticisms. Ever since my first trip to the middle-east as a teenager I have been intrigued with higher knowledge on the subject matter, also including world history, and politics…I have immersed myself in my own personal searches for truth for more than 20yrs. I don’t mention this for egotistical reasons nor to declare myself a scholar etc…I merely make mention for the sole importance for others to realize that the cache of knowledge is Not contained In one lecture, nor in one book written by man…Truth comes from the creator, and like many things lying in wait of discovery the truth is also… Let me tell you, the world will al ways be divided not just between ethnicity but also within ethnicity because of their inability to be on one accord. Truth faith, meaning people who believe, but believe according to true historical succession of scripture in the creator by his blessed and chosen few who have been responsible in delivering that guidance…If one would read Albert Pike (my blog entitled “the plot”) or just googled him in relation to the letter he publish and disseminated to other free-masons jockeying for key political positions; outlines to the letter the scripted details as to how the 3 major world wars would play out. If you would also read therein about the deliberate exhaustion of Christianity you would then see how it has manifested itself to date in that deliberate decadence bringing people to the new planned order of theism...a degenerate belief in God but without boundaries of action which is ultimately disbelief because it bares no substance of evidence to what is proclaimed. This exhaustion of Christianity has been taking place ever since before the separation of Church and state weaken the faith of people by removing God from the remembrance of daily life. Carried on the back of inconclusive scripture re-published every year differing with ever previous version further sustaining its lie…the concepts have been highlighted with the deliberate attack against Islam, which is a moving into the final phase of Pike’s plan to the final war. If I may brief, bring about my concluding point with a tangent into recent events; 911 is mired in lies that all pave the way for Western foreign policy to infiltrate the middle-eastern regions and expand in its military budget in expansion of NATO all in preparation. Serving as a Segway to re-arousing truth, minds not politically captured by political philosophy are again active in combating corruption they see playing out in government policy; however as prophesied this galvanization is centered on religious truth which has a moral and deeper seated cohesion within humanity something politics doesn’t have. Politics for the past 120 years especially have played in place of divine scripture and so by current world events people are beginning to see the similarity between the two. Cleverly mascaraed before the face of true evil has emerge… As a result, the Prophet Muhammad s.a.w has been re-introduced to the world and to peoples who haven’t yet had the pleasure of meeting such a man, and again biblical sources, historical sources, and preserved revelation are confirming him so much so that Islam has spread to every corner of the world as it was said would happen. This is the missing element among abandoning Christians’ & Atheist who now make declaration of allegiance to other affiliate groups of political misguidance. Racism now in reverse is also a problem, as historical accounts are re-applied by the ancestors of victims who demonize the ancestors of those who practiced injustices against a downtrodden people. These prejudices have been applied in such ways that revelation itself has been high-jacked by black men who they themselves declared to be Allah’s last messenger. Case in point Elijah Muhammad, who is the founder of the nation of Islam; who would later recruit Malik al-hajj al-shabazz (Malcom x), which is still in operation today under the leader ship of Louis Farrakhan…This philosophy of Islam is something that serves to further distance the black man from the truth and is often a road block to the acceptance for such men and women desperately in need of the truth. Regarded as more of an under-privilege, jail-house doctrine most black people never hear any teaching from the Quran itself, but instead are favored by biblical scripture, and belief in an avatar (god incarnate) whom they accredit all knowledge etc. and conveyed by Elijah Muhammad. The other many spin-off groups of Muslims whom have also taken philosophy & opinionated interpretation often of the English text (unable to read the Arabic) follows along the lines of deviant Shii’ah and Sufi sects. However, this stigmatization only seems to be affecting the blacks in America, as the numbers of other ethnicity grows exponentitionaly. Minister Farrakhan preaches Christianity with a twist of nationalistic political doctrine with few verses of the Quran when appropriate to accompany the points he’s making, so black audiences aren’t seeing nor hearing the truth. They are instead only being called to align politically with the Minister on means of calling for justice that are redundantly denied and mocked at. Have a look at the lecture, if your pressed for time fast forward to 1hr into the lecture and the sheikh speaks to the topic i was making. Briefly, he is well acquainted with the family of Malcolm, and served as an imam in New York... Ego centrism view-points are the reasons that history is distorted so much today and the black man is disregard most of all in history…Even within the circles of Muslims on the subject as the world deliberately ignores these truths. One way of putting things back into perspective would be by stating some the facts uttered by the prophet s.a.w. himself… There are many hadith say that when the prophet Mohamed (pbuh) returned from his ascent to the Seven Heavens, he described the color of some of the prophets. If this information wasn’t important, the prophet Mohamed (pbuh) wouldn’t have mentioned it. The prophet Mohamed (pbuh) didn’t speak nonsense or idle speech. The prophet Mohamed (pbuh) described the prophet Musa (Moses) as black-skinned and kinky-haired. Imam Ahmed ibn Hanbal related in his Masnad (hadith number 3365) the following description that the prophet Mohamed (pbuh) gave of Musa’s (Moses’) color: وَرَأَيْتُ مُوسَى أَسْحَمَ آدَمَ Musa (Moses) was jet-black skinned. Muslim relates in his Sahih Muslim (hadith numbers 239 and 243) that Ibn Abbas r.a said that the prophet Mohamed (pbuh) described Musa’s (Moses’) appearance as follows: َأَمَّا مُوسَى فَرَجُلٌ آدَمُ جَعْدٌ As for Musa (Moses), he was black-skinned and kinky-haired. (hadith 243) قَالَ ذَكَرَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ حِينَ أُسْرِيَ بِهِ فَقَالَ مُوسَى آدَمُ طُوَالٌ كَأَنَّهُ مِنْ رِجَالِ شَنُوءَةَ He (Ibn Abbas) said that the prophet (pbuh) mentioned the time he was ascended to the Heavens and he said that Musa (Moses) was black-skinned and tall as if he was from the tribe of Shanuaa. (hadith 239) Also, Allah says in verse 108 of surat El-Aaraaf: وَنَزَعَ يَدَهُ فَإِذَا هِيَ بَيْضَاء لِلنَّاظِرِينَ And he drew forth his hand (from his bosom): and lo! it was white for the beholders. [al-Aaraaf- verse 108] al-Quortobi says in his tafsir of the verse: وكان موسى أسمر شديد السمرة Musa (Moses) was black-skinned. Never do you see those actors portrayed as Moses performing the miracle of his hands turning white, and if so they never show his hand be the contrast isn’t like that of the black peoples who witnessed this sign from Musa a.s.. With no white people around the notion of this sign becomes as significant as the others is proving Musa a.s. was a Nabi of Allah to his people and to the Pharaoh himself. It is a stone cold fact that Musa a.s. was black, as the Hebrews were enslaved by the Pharaoh who succeeded the Pharaoh who promoted Yusuf a.s. to governor over Egypt after his interpretation of his dream of the pending drought and exoneration of guilt of imprisonment. The hieroglyphs are another proof of which depict the slave labor force that existed until the advent of Musa a.s. who would lead the people out of Egypt in the desert of Arabia for 40yrs while the older generation accustomed to idol worship died off along with Musa a.s. and Harun a.s. his brother, and then taken by Yushua Ibn Nun a.s. (Joshua) into the current land called Israel today. There are many other hadith that say the same thing about Musa’s (Moses’) appearance. Why are Muslims silent about this? Why aren’t Muslims striving to make this common knowledge? Why aren’t Muslims spreading these words of the prophet (pbuh)? Because these words of the prophet Mohamed (pbuh) are not common knowledge, the Muslims have lost Palestine, the land where the third holiest mosque is found. If it were common knowledge that Musa (Moses) was black-skinned with kinky hair, the European descendants of Japheth who have taken over Palestine would never have claimed that they were Hebrews and claimed that Palestine was theirs. Is this not the best daleel to who the rightful owners of the land are? Do you see the result of concealing the words of Allah and His prophet? Hence the Prophet s.a.w always spoke and defined matters because those defining matters would be clarified by his doing so. So, its easy to see today with all the racial undertones throughout society today, which are now breeding grounds for more racial decadence in denial of the truth... Everyone on Earth today is descended from Sam [(brown to reddish brown skin slender, e-elongated cranial, and tall)], Ham (Stout, Rounded cranial, big-boned, darker skin), or Japheth (Caucus Mtn region Caucasian, European), the three sons of Nuh a.s. (Noah). The Arabs and the Hebrews are descendants of Sam. That’s why they are called Semites. Europeans, Turks, Ashkenazi, and Persians, for example, are descendants of Japheth. Many people in the area called Africa are descendants of Ham. The people who occupied Palestine and claimed it as theirs are, in reality Ashkenazi descendants of Japheth. Ibn Abbas said that Allah made the descendants of Sam and the descendants of Ham black-skinned and He made the descendants of Japheth white-skinned. By not making this and what the prophet Mohamed (pbuh) said about the appearance of Musa (Moses) common knowledge, the Muslims have, in effect, helped the Ashkenazi Japhetic Jews take the land of Palestine from the Muslims. Why is this? Well, many Arabs are more European but like to be portrayed in the same likeness of our beloved Prophet s.a.w. so they don't say anything to this regard concealing even their own true identity. Like I said, if it were common knowledge that Musa (Moses) and the Hebrews were black-skinned, Palestine and the land of the third holiest mosque would be in the hands of the Muslims. The mere fact that the prophet Mohamed (pbuh) came from the Heavens describing the appearance of Musa (Moses) should show us that he felt that this was important information. There are also many hadith that describe Eesa (Jesus) as black-skinned. Bukhari relates that Ibn Umar r.a. said, “No! I swear by Allah that the prophet (pbuh) didn’t say that Jesus was light-skinned, but he said ‘While I was asleep[in a dream he saw], I was walking around the Kaaba when I saw a black-skinned man with non-kinky hair between two men. I asked who the man was and I was told that he was Eesa (Jesus) the son of Maryam.’…” حَدَّثَنَا أَحْمَدُ بْنُ مُحَمَّدٍ الْمَكِّيُّ قَالَ سَمِعْتُ إِبْرَاهِيمَ بْنَ سَعْدٍ قَالَ حَدَّثَنِي الزُّهْرِيُّ عَنْ سَالِمٍ عَنْ أَبِيهِ قَالَ لَا وَاللَّهِ مَا قَالَ النَّبِيُّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ لِعِيسَى أَحْمَرُ وَلَكِنْ قَالَ بَيْنَمَا أَنَا نَائِمٌ أَطُوفُ بِالْكَعْبَةِ فَإِذَا رَجُلٌ آدَمُ سَبْطُ الشَّعَرِ يُهَادَى بَيْنَ رَجُلَيْنِ يَنْطِفُ رَأْسُهُ مَاءً أَوْ يُهَرَاقُ رَأْسُهُ مَاءً فَقُلْتُ مَنْ هَذَا قَالُوا ابْنُ مَرْيَمَ فَذَهَبْتُ أَلْتَفِتُ فَإِذَا رَجُلٌ أَحْمَرُ جَسِيمٌ جَعْدُ الرَّأْسِ أَعْوَرُ عَيْنِهِ الْيُمْنَى كَأَنَّ عَيْنَهُ عِنَبَةٌ طَافِيَةٌ قُلْتُ مَنْ هَذَا قَالُوا هَذَا الدَّجَّالُ وَأَقْرَبُ النَّاسِ بِهِ شَبَهًا ابْنُ قَطَنٍ قَالَ الزُّهْرِيُّ رَجُلٌ مِنْ خُزَاعَةَ هَلَكَ فِي الْجَاهِلِيَّةِ Bukhari (hadith number 3185) There are many other hadith related by Bukhari, Muslim, Imam Ahmed, and others that describe Isa (Jesus) as black-skinned. I ask those who claim that it is not necessary to talk about the physical description of the prophets why it is that Ibn Umar found it important enough for him to swear by Allah that the prophet Mohamed (pbuh) said that Isa (Jesus) was black-skinned. Why are we avoiding this subject instead of striving to make it common knowledge? Why are we hiding the truth about the appearance of the prophets? Why are we diminishing the importance of that which Allah spoke about and gave importance to? Why are we diminishing the importance of that which the prophet Mohamed (pbuh) and his companions spoke about and gave importance to? Avoiding this topic is innovation in Islam. Allah mentioned the topic. The prophet Mohamed (pbuh) and his companions mentioned the topic. If they had felt that there was good in avoiding the topic, they would have avoided it. Is there anyone today who feels that he/she knows what is good for Islam and mankind better than Allah? Is there a Muslim today who feels that he/she knows what is good for Islam and mankind better than the prophet Mohamed (pbuh) and his companions? It is related that the prophet Hud, who was from the ancient Arab tribe of Aad, was also described as jet-black skinned? The prophet Hud was from the tribe of Aad the son of Aus the son of Iram the son of Sam. Iram, Arfakshadh, Ashudh, and Lodh were the brothers of Elam the son of Sam. It is a known fact that the Elamites were a black-skinned people. It is related that ibn Al-Kalbi, the famous genealogist/transmitter of hadith/linguist/Arab historian who died in 763 A.D., said: وروى ابن الكَلبي عن رجاله، عن الأصْبْغَ بن نباتة، قال: كنّا عند علي بن أبي طالب رضي الله عنه وفي خلافة عمر، فسأَلَ رجلاً عن حَضْرَ مَوْت، فقال أعَالِمٌ أنتَ بحضر موت؟ قال: إذا جهلتُها فما أعلمُ غيرها. قال: أتعرف مَوضِع الأحقاف؟ قال: كأنَّك تسأل عن قَبْرهُود. قال: نعم. قال: خرجتُ وأنا غُلاَمٌ في أُغيْلمةٍ من الحيّ، نريد أن نَأْتي قَبْرهَ، لبُعْدِ صيته، فسِرْنا في وادي الأحقاف أيّاماً، وفينا من قد عَرَف الموضع: حتى انْتَهَيْنَا إلى كثيبٍ أَحْمَر، فيه كهوف، فانْتَهَى بنا ذلك الرجل إلى كَهفٍ منها، فدَخَلْناه، فأَمْعَنَّا فيه، فانْتَهَيْنَا إلى حَجَرَيْنِ قد أُطْبِقَ أَحدُهما فوق الآخر، وفيه خَلَلٌ يدْخُل منه (الرجل) النحيفُ متجانفاً فرَأيْتُ رجلاً على سرير، شديدَ الأُدْمة، كَثَّ اللحية، قد يَبِسَ على سريره، وإذا لمستُ شيئاً من جسده وَجَدْتُه صُلْباً، وعند رأسه كتابٌ بالعربيّةّ: أنا هُودٌ (النبيّ) الذي آمنتُ بالله، وأَسِفْتُ على عاد لكُفْرُها، وما كان لأمْر الله من مَرَد قال علي: كذا سمعتُه من أبي القاسم، صلى الله عليه وسلم Ibn Al-Kalbi related from his sources that El-Asbagh ibn Nabaata said, “We were with Ali ibn Abi Talib (RAA) during the caliphate of Umar and he (Ali) asked a man about Hadramout. He (Ali) asked, ‘Do you know about Hadramout?’ The man said, ‘If I don’t know about Hadramout, I don’t know anything.’ Ali said, ‘Do you know where El-Ahqaaf is?’ The man said, ‘It seems that you are asking about the grave of Hud.’ Ali said, ‘Yes, that’s right.’ The man said, ‘I and some boys from the neighborhood went out in search of his grave because we heard so much about him. We traveled for days through the valley of El-Ahqaaf. There was a person with us who knew the exact location of the grave. We then reached a red sand dune where there were caves. The man who knew the exact location of the grave took us to one of the caves and we entered it and looked around in it. We then came across two stones, one on top of the other, and there was an opening that a thin person could fit through from an inclined position [vertically inclined held by the feet]. I saw (in the opening) a jet-black skinned man with a thick beard lying stiffly on a bed. I touched a part of his body and it was stiff. Near his head was Arabic writing which said: I am Hud, who believed in Allah and felt sorry for Aad because of their disbelief. Allah’s decree cannot be averted. Ali then said, ‘I heard it the same way from Abu Al-Qasim (the prophet Mohamed pbuh)’” Scholars of hadith do not consider Ibn Al-Kalbi and Asbagh ibn Nabata reliable sources for hadith. However, I‘ve mentioned what Ibn Al-Kalbi and Asbagh ibn Nabata said about Hud’s appearance because though the hadith may be unsound, the meaning is true. Also, it shows that the Arabs of the past were a black-skinned people because Asbagh wouldn’t have described Hud ibn Abdella ibn Rabah ibn Jaloud ibn Aad ibn Aus ibn Iram ibn Sam ibn Nuh as jet-black-skinned if the Arabs weren’t black-skinned. As you can see, the true appearance of the Arabs of the past is entirely different from the appearance most people today think that the Arabs had. As a result, most people today have an inaccurate conception of what the prophet Mohamed’s (pbuh) color was. The reason for this misconception is because some people either don’t have a correct understanding of the Arabic words that were used to describe the prophet Mohamed (pbuh) and others in the past or they know and they don’t want to say the reality. Today’s Arab producers show the pure Arabs as white-skinned and anyone who actually looks like a pure Arab is not shown as an Arab but as a non-Arab slave. Where did Arab producers get this false idea? This is another reason people today have a false idea about what a pure Arab looks like. Are today’s Arab producers purposely misinforming the masses or are they innocently ignorant of the appearance of the Arabs of the past? Ali ibn Abi Talib (RAA), the cousin and son-in-law of the prophet Mohamed (pbuh) and the ancestor of all people who are called sharifs (noble descendants of the prophet Mohamed pbuh), was described as jet-black skinned and so were his descendants (see The Unknown Arabs pages 60-63). Look at how today’s Arab producers portrayed Ali’s father Abi Talib (the brother of the prophet Mohamed’s (pbuh) father) in the film The Messenger. Most hadith describe the prophet Mohamed (pbuh) as not very black-skinned and not light-skinned, with hair that was not extremely kinky and not non-kinky. Another hadith describes the prophet’s (pbuh) color as brown, which, as I explain in The Unknown Arabs, means a color darker than the color that the term is used for today. The hadith that describes the prophet’s (pbuh) color as brown is related by Tirmidhi (hadith number 1676). Some hadith describe the prophet’s (pbuh) color as “white”. However, the meaning that the Arabs intended for the term “white”, when used to describe people, was completely different from the usual meaning of white [light skinned from jet-black]. The famous, old Arabic dictionary Lisan El Arab also quotes the author of El-Tahdhib, Saad El-Din Masud ibn Umar El-Taftaazaani (1312-1389 A.D.) as saying: التهذيب: إِذا قالت العرب فلان أَبْـيَضُ وفلانة بَـيْضاء فالـمعنى نَقاء العِرْض من الدنَس والعيوب... لا يريدون به بَـياضَ اللون ولكنهم يريدون الـمدح بالكرم ونَقاءِ العِرْض من العيوب، وإِذا قالوا: فلان أَبْـيَض الوجه وفلانة بَـيْضاءُ الوجه أَرادوا نقاءَ اللون من الكَلَفِ والسوادِ الشائن “When the Arabs said that a man or a woman was white, they meant that the person had a faultless honor…they didn’t mean white skin. What they meant by this was to praise the person for his/her generosity and faultless honor. When they said that a man or woman had a white face, they meant that the person had a complexion free of blemishes and free of an unattractive blackness.” Shams El-Din Mohamed ibn Ahmed ibn Othman El-Dhahabi (died 1374 A.D.) said: العرب إذا قالتّ: فلان أبيض فإنهم يريدون الحنطي أللون بحلية سوداء “When the Arabs said that a person was white, they meant that he/she had a black complexion with a wheat-colored undertone.” This description that the Arabs of the past gave of a pure Arab should help give people today a better understanding of the meanings of the terms used to describe the prophet Mohamed (pbuh). It’s time for people to stop hiding the truth about the appearance of the prophet Mohamed (pbuh), his family, and his people. As I said, Ali ibn Abi Talib, the first cousin and son-in-law of the prophet Mohamed (pbuh) was described as jet-black skinned. Ali’s father was the prophet’s uncle (his father’s brother). In my book, The Unknown Arabs, I mention many other noble, pure-blooded Arabs who were described as jet-black skinned. Many of the noble, pure-blooded, jet-black-skinned Arabs that I mention were from the prophet Mohamed’s (pbuh) tribe. There are some who try to avoid this topic by saying Allah’s words: يَا أَيُّهَا النَّاسُ إِنَّا خَلَقْنَاكُم مِّن ذَكَرٍ وَأُنثَى وَجَعَلْنَاكُمْ شُعُوبًا وَقَبَائِلَ لِتَعَارَفُوا إِنَّ أَكْرَمَكُمْ عِندَ اللَّهِ أَتْقَاكُمْ إِنَّ اللَّهَ عَلِيمٌ خَبِيرٌ O mankind! Lo! We have created you male and female, and have made `you nations and tribes that ye may know one another. Lo! The noblest of you, in the sight of Allah, is the best in conduct. Lo! Allah is Knower, Aware. (Hujaraat-verse 13) The Asab an'Nuzool (Reasons for Revelation explain this) [49:13]. Said Ibn 'Abbas: “This was revealed about Thabit ibn Qays when he made a remark about the man who did not make room for him to sit: 'What, the son of so-and-so [referring to his mother]'. The Messenger of Allah, Allah bless him and give him peace, said: 'Who mentioned that woman?' Thabit stood up and said: 'I did, O Messenger of Allah!' The Messenger said to him: 'Look at the faces of those present'. And when he looked, he asked him: 'What do you see?' He said: 'I see white, red and black people'. The Prophet said: 'Well, you are not better than any of them unless it be through [the good practice of] religion and God-fearingness'. Allah, exalted is He, then revealed this verse”. Muqatil said: “On the day Mecca was conquered, the Messenger of Allah, Allah bless him and give him peace, ordered Bilal to climb on the roof of the Ka'bah and perform the call to prayer. 'Attab ibn Asid commented on this: 'Praise be to Allah, that Allah has taken my father to Him and made that he did not see this day'. Al-Harith ibn Hisham said: 'Did Muhammad not find any other caller to prayer except this black raven?' Suhayl ibn 'Amr said: 'Allah willing, he will change him'. Abu Sufyan, on the other hand, said: 'I am not going to make any comment; I am afraid that the Lord of heaven will divulge what I say!' Gabriel, peace be upon him, went to the Prophet, Allah bless him and give him peace, and informed him about what they said. The Prophet summoned them and asked them about what they said and they admitted it. Allah, exalted is He, then revealed this verse warning them against boasting about their lineages and abundance of wealth and against looking down on the poor”. I ask all who try to use this verse as an excuse for concealing Allah’s words and the prophet Mohamed’s (pbuh) words what this verse has to do with what I am talking about here. How could giving a correct description of the prophets and certain peoples possibly be construed as being racist? Allah described the color of the mud that Adam was created from. The prophet Mohamed (pbuh) described the color of Musa (Moses) and Isa (Jesus). The companions of the prophet Mohamed (pbuh) described the color of people. When did it become a forbidden or taboo subject? If this was done it would keep things in its proper perspective and thus eliminate racism...Who made this subject taboo in Islam? Does one really believe that this verse means that we are supposed to conceal truths that Allah made clear in His book? Does this verse mean that we are supposed to conceal the fact that Allah said that He created our father Adam from black mud? Does this verse mean that we are supposed to conceal the fact that the prophet Mohamed (pbuh) said that Musa (Moses) and Isa (Jesus) were black-skinned? One should be careful of using Allah’s verses to justify one’s sins. In fact, by avoiding this topic, one is going against what the verse says that we are supposed to do. Allah says that He created us nations and tribes لِتَعَارَفُوا “that ye may know one another”. If we don’t know what our father Adam looked like, what the Arabs looked like, what the Hebrews looked like, who is a descendant of Japheth, who is a Hebrew, who is a European, we are not doing what Allah says that we are supposed to do. Allah says that He made us nations and tribes لِتَعَارَفُوا “that ye may know one another”. The scholars say that this means so that we can know who is the son of whom and who is from whom. Am I asking any more than this? http://savethetruearabs.blogspot.com/2009/08/cure-for-racial-prejudice-against-dark_5648.html. The Arab Crows (أغربة العرب) are the famous Arab poets of the past who were so dark-skinned that their color resembled the color of a crow. Some of the Arab Crows lived in Pre-Islamic times and others lived during the period between Pre-Islamic times and Islamic times. Ibn Mandhour says in his book Lisan Al-Arab that the Arab Crows are Antarah, Khafaf ibn Nadba from the tribe of Sulaym, Abu Umair ibn Al-Hubaab from the tribe of Sulaym, Sulaik ibn Sulaka, Hisham ibn Uqba ibn Abi Mu'eet, Abdellah ibn Khaazim from the tribe of Sulaym, Umair ibn Abu Umair ibn Al-Hubaab from the tribe of Sulaym, Hammaam ibn Mutarraf from the tribe of Taghlib, Muntashir ibn Wahb Al-Baahili, Matar ibn Awfaa Al-Mazini, Taabbata Sharra, and Al-Shanfara. Many people today make the mistake of assuming that since these "Arab Crows" are so black-skinned, they must be descended from "Africans". For example, read what was said about Khaffaf ibn Nadba from the tribe of Sulaym: قال خفاف بن ندبة - وهي أمه، وكانت حبشية..." "Khafaf the son of Nadba - and Nadba was an Ethiopian slave-girl - said..." This is what they say about Khafaf's mother, but the reality is his mother was a pure Arab from the tribe of Bani Al-Harith ibn Ka'ab. Ibn Sa'ad says in his book Al-Tabaqaat: خفاف بن عمير ابن الحارث بن شريد واسمه عمرو بن رباح بن يقظة بن عصية بن خفاف بن امرئ القيس بن بهثة بن سليم وكان شاعرا وهو الذي يقال له خفاف بن ندبة وهي أمة بها يعرف وهى ابنة الشيطان بن قنان سبية من بني الحارث بن كعب ويقال إن ندية كانت سوداء وشهد خفاف فتح مكة مع رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم وكان معه لواء بني سليم الأخر. "Khafaf the son of Umair the son of Al-Harith the son of Amru (Shuraid) the son of Rabbah the son of Yaqidha the son of Asiyya the son of Khafaf the son of Imr Al-Qais the son of Bahtha the son of Sulaym. He was a poet and was called Khafaf the son of Nadba and Nadba is a slave-girl and Khafaf was known by her. She (Nadba) is the daughter of Al-Shaytan the son of Qanan and she was captured from the tribe of Bani Al-Harith ibn Ka'ab. It is said that Nadba was black-skinned. Khafaf was present with the Prophet (SAWS) during the conquest of Mecca and he carried the flag of the tribe of Sulaym." Ibn Hajar says in his book Al-Isaaba Fi Tamyeez Al-Sahaaba: خفاف بن عمير بن الحارث بن الشريد بن رياح بن يقظة بن عصية بن خفاف بن امرئ القيس بن بهثة بن سليم وهو المعروف بابن ندبة بنون وهي أمه قال بن الكلبي شهد الفتح وكان معه لواء بني سليم وكان شاعرًا مشهورا وقال الأصمعي شهد حنينًا وثبت على إسلامه في الردة وبقي إلى زمن عمر وقال أبو عبيدة أغار الحارث بن الشريد يعني جد خفاف هذا على بني الحارث بن كعب فسبي ندبة فوهبها لابنه عمير فولدت له خفافا فنسب إليها قال المرزباني هي ندبة بنت أبان بن شيطان بن قنان بن سلمة. Khafaf the son of Umair the son of Al-Harith the son of Shuraid the son of Rabbah the son of Yaqidha the son of Asiyya the son of Khafaf the son of Imr Al-Qais the son of Bahtha the son of Sulaym. He was a famous poet. Al-Asma'ee said that he was present at the battle of Hunain and that he remained a Muslim during period of apostasy and he was still alive during the reign of Umar. Abu Ubayda said that Al-Harith the son of Shuraid - the grandfather of Khafaf - raided the tribe of Bani Al-Harith ibn Ka'ab and captured Nadba and gave her to his son Umair and she gave birth to Khafaf through Umair and Khafaf was called the son of Nadba. Al-Mirzbaani says that she is Nadba the daughter of Abaan the son of Al-Shaytan the son of Qanan the son of Salama. Bani Al-Harith ibn Ka'ab is a large Arab tribe and Al-Harith ibn Ka'ab is the son of Amru the son of 'Illa the son of Khalid the son of Midhhaj. Read what is said about another Arab Crow - Shanfara: ويعني اسمه (غليظ الشفاه ) ، ويدل أن دماء حبشية كانت تجري فيه "And his name means 'thick-lipped', which shows that Ethiopian blood ran through his veins." Read what another person said is a reason that he hopes that Al-Shanfara is not from the Arab tribe of Shihr: انه كان اسودا ونحن جميعا لآدم ولا فضل لاحد على احد الا بالتقوى ولكنه كان كافرا وفوق هذا من اصول افريقية اما من ناحية الاب او الام والعرب ليس فيهم السواد الوارد في الشنفرى "...Because he (Al-Shanfara) was black-skinned - we are all from Adam and no one is any better than the next except according to piety - but he was an unbeliever and to make matters worse, he was of African origin either from his father or from his mother and the Arabs are not black-skinned like Al-Shanfara was described". This is what they say about Al-Shanfara, but the truth of the matter is that his father was from the pure Arab tribe of Al-Azd and his mother was from the pure Arab tribe of Fahm. Read what Al-Shanfara said about himself: "انا من خيار الحجر بيتاً ومنصباً ** وامي ابنة الاحرار لو تعرفينها" "I am from the best of the clan of Hujr (a clan of the tribe of Al-Azd) in origin and status. And my mother is the daughter of the freemen - if you only knew her!" There is also the Arab Crow Taabbata Sharra. His real name is Thaabi the son of Jaabir the son of Sufyan the son of 'Umaythil the son of 'Udayy the son of Ka'ab the son of Hazin the son of Tamim the son of Sa'ad the son of Fahm the son of Amru the son of Qais 'Ailan the son of Mudar the son of Nizaar. His mother - Umayma - was from the Bani Qain branch of the Arab tribe of Fahm the son of Amru the son of Qais 'Ailan the son of Mudar the son of Nizaar. As you can see, Taabbata Sharra, too, was a pure Arab from the pure Arab tribe of Fahm. Posted by Tariq Berry at 8:50 AM 18 comments: Mohamed Al-Nafs Al-Zakia - The Pure-Blooded QuraishiTo get a better idea of what the Arabs of the past looked like, let's take a close and careful look at the Prophet Mohamed's (SAWS) descendant Mohamed Al-Nafs Al-Zakia the son of Abdellah the son of Al-Hasan the son of Al-Hasan the son of Ali the son of Abu Talib. It is a known fact that Mohamed Al-Nafs Al-Zakia was a pure-blooded Arab from his father's side and his mother's side. This is why he was nick-named The Pure-Blooded Quraishi. This is why he said the following about himself: "You know that no one has as close relations to or relations to anyone better than he whom I am very closely related to (meaning the Prophet Mohamed (SAWS))". What color would most people today expect a person who says such a thing to be? ِAl-Hafidh Al-Dhahabi says: Mohamed Al-Nafs Al-Zakia was "black-skinned and huge". Al-Tabari says: "Mohamed Al-Nafs Al-Zakia was tall, jet-black-skinned and huge. He was nick-named The Bituminous because of his blackness and Abu Ja'afar Al-Mansour used to call him Charcoal". Bear in mind that the person called The Bituminous and Charcoal was a pure-blooded Arab closely related to the Prophet Mohamed (SAWS). Remember that this person called The Bituminous and Charcoal said: "You know that no one has as close relations to or relations to anyone better than he whom I am very closely related to (meaning the Prophet Mohamed (SAWS))". I believe that this should give readers a very clear picture of how dark-skinned Mohamed Al-Nafs Al-Zakia - the pure-blooded Arab direct descendant of the Prophet Mohamed (SAWS) was. Mohamed Al-Nafs Al-Zakia had a son named Al-Hasan. Ibn Hazim says: "Al-Hasan (the son of Mohamed Al-Nafs Al-Zakia) was so black-skinned that he was nick-named The Father of the Tar. We all know how dark tar is. That is the description of Mohamed Al-Nafs Al-Zakia the son of Abdellah the son of Al-Hasan the son of Al-Hasan the son of Ali the son of Abu Talib. That is the blackness of Mohamed Al-Nafs Al-Zakia, who said about himself: "I am descended from the Prophet (SAWS) from my mother's side AND my father's side. I am the purest of Bani Hashim (the branch of Quraish that the Prophet Mohamed (SAWS) is from) in genealogy and the noblest of them both paternally AND maternally. NO NON-ARAB BLOOD RUNS THROUGH MY VEINS! Doesn't this say it all? I believe that this is the proof of all proofs that the original Arabs were a dark-skinned people. http://savethetruearabs.blogspot.com/ So the political reasoning has always been to distort the truth about history and peoples, which is why we find ultimate truth with the last prophet and the Quran and his sunnah.
The mixture of human reason and bits taken from the bible and other sources deludes the the truth about the soul even further, and only serves to open the door for a succession of non-conclusive ideas about its truth. The soul is an element or branch of knowledge that the creator has shared only a little bit of Knowledge about: وَيَسْأَلُونَكَ عَنِ الرُّوحِ قُلِ الرُّوحُ مِنْ أَمْرِ رَبِّي وَمَا أُوتِيتُم مِّن الْعِلْمِ إِلاَّ قَلِيلاً And they ask you (O Muhammad SAW) concerning the Ruh (the Spirit); Say: "The Ruh (the Spirit): it is one of the things, the knowledge of which is only with my Lord. And of knowledge, you (mankind) have been given only a little." [surah Al-Isra 17:85} The Soul/Spirit is termed Ruh (rooh) in arabic and this is the element from the creator which is pure. A particular proof of that would be the breathe of the creator was blown onto Adam in which Adam them became a human being (meaning alive with conscious). However, the term Ruh is used in other ways such as to refer to the Angel Jabril a.s. (Gabriel), who is Allah's messenger of revelation of whom the prophets would see etc. In the bible the english translation is used "spirit". The best example would be John 16:13 But when he, the Spirit of truth, comes, he will guide you into all the truth. He will not speak on his own; he will speak only what he hears, and he will tell you what is yet to come. If you remember what I said about the term Ruh/Spirit is used when referring to the purity of something, so in the case of the bible the term spirit was referring to the prophet that was to come after Eesa bin Mariam a.s. (Jesus) who was the one speaking in that verse. Now, many Christians have translated that word spirit to mean the only ghost or comforter as some put it...but i invite you to watch the short series i prepared on that particular topic.
So, having differences of inclination we can further define these particualar aspects of the "Nafs"...
No deed done is free of intent. Deeds are of two types (1) deeds of the body (2) deeds of the heart...Intentions are only known by the individual and Allah, but Allah has also enabled the Two angels who record every deed with the ability to see the intention as well, so that each deed is recorded to its intention. The heart in Arabic is Qalb and it refers to something that is always changing. In & out of love, like/dislike, happy/sad, faith/disbelief...yup the human disposition is always swing from one condition to the other. The prophet s.a.w said, "it takes its name from "Taqallub", meaning its like that feather at the root of a tree being turned over and over by the wind". However, the heart has the capacity to reason and understand {quran Hajj 22:46} {Araf 7:179}. The actions of the self will thus directly effect the heart. Evil deeds, deeds of prohibitions and the likes stain the heart with black spots for each time something is done until the entire heart is covered and encased becoming hardened and locked....So make it a practice of the conscious to see and understand why it is you do what you do before its too late...
some characteristics of the heart are:
Sayyar Ismail 2015 Every year the summer leaves with a brief season called fall when all the fruits and greens turn yellow, dry out and die...Full trees become barren of their leaves and the land is again deadened. But, the following year in Spring, the earth is again brought back to life...Similarly, we mammals are prone to a condition we can't escape called sleep. Typically each night each of us falls prey to a condition in which we succumb to sleep. After some times passes we again arise to carry on with life. The processes are part of the renewing of the earth and the human being (including animals) respectively, but each has a more significant role of understanding that is virtually taken for granite and over looked. Islam calls it the minor resurrection...We are reminded within ourselves and within the creation itself of Allah's ability to resurrect the dead earth as well as the human being except that or those whom death is decreed... Today most people have given into the forgetfulness of youth, good health, wealth, and libertarian type attitudes of sustaining pleasure in all of its forms. So, much so that now that national security of western states have built and support their newly drafted constitutions upon these same views. Foreign policies that change governments, armies that work to seize natural resources, 1000 foreign basis & embassies to guarantee the safe passage of goods both on land & sea, hyper-sexual and fashion fixated youth that glamorize material possessions as well as the fleshy material that perpetuate unmanageable states of lust & increase unwed births or abortions. But apart from all that at the heart of such views lies a pure godless society with fascism practices; which legitimizes its doctrine on the servitude of the weaker or subjected too that of the stronger. Thus the hierarchical concept of tiered societies in service on to the other up the chain. Very cleverly mascaraed as prosperity to its buyers, and supported by philosophies rooted in satanism that aspire the human being to fulfillment of worldly desires none of which can be sustained. In other words this life and this world are sought to be made a paradise, while missing the whole purpose of life and the certainty that you will fail in felicity in this world by those efforts. I find it fascinating from a sense of bewilderment that people don't take into account the principals of death as a certainty. Or, better yet, the seriousness of its inevitable, prescribed time which isn't a prescription of ones on fate or choices, but it is surely something decreed. When, where, how, & time of appointment... But the attitude & character of so many people is after a career is obtained, a nice place to live, something descent to drive...comes the gym membership, organic food shopping with band-wagon, he-said-she-said diets etc. all in an effort to look and feel our best...but really at the heart of that is the desire to cheat death. Push it off as far as one can. In the meantime the irony of dangerous unprotected sexual encounters, alcohol and driving under the influence, and a host of other things people do in the name of fun that taunts death, but still overlooked. Neither youth nor wealth can keep one from their predestined time. We have all been guilty of these characteristics and actions. But Isma'il, why do we need to be thoughtful or remind of events that are otherwise less appealing to think about? Well, first I would disagree with you and say its a matter of perception. If you consider your mortality then in doing so, your existence should be more so beautiful and cherished. It would literally bring manifested meaning to the term living in the moment, which most who utter it, haven't actualized the concept. Let me share a story with you, which happens to be a true story...I worked some years erecting tall buildings and during lunch one day, some guys were fighting quite seriously that the police had to be called. After the interruption one of the guys begin to tell us. In a building he was working they were on the 7th floor working with a crew of men. It was a pretty breezy day with wind gust that were quite strong, and tie points anchored into the foundation I-beams had to be maintained. Well, one worker couldn't reach an area he need to get to with his tie-off, so he untied himself to carry out his task. About 10mins into the task the thought of re securing himself faded to the back of his mind.A wind gust come and blew the man of the 7th floor where he feel 7 floors to the ground. The sidewalk was teaming with people all busy with their business of the day as this person fell abruptly to the ground. Stunned and stolen of breathe with fleeting thoughts of what they had just witnessed, they watch as the man stands up and brushes himself off...The man friends coming rushing to him only to find the man only a little shook-en up. In order to come the nerves a bit the guys spot a pub across the street and the man who fell suggested going to have a drink, as everyone else was begging him to wait on the ambulance that was called, so they could look him over. But, the man insisted, so they began to cross the street. When the gentleman walked across the busy street a bus come from no where and hit the man fatally killing him. You see, the angel of death will be awaiting each of us at our prescribed times, and when we aren't where we're suppose to be things will occur that usher us to that appointed time & place as this story clearly illustrates. You see the main reason most people take death as something negative is because they have not yet come to understand the true meaning of life. Disbelief= wrong belief, or other means such as evolution are systems that deprive mankind of understanding that death is the inevitable situation none can prevent. Its inevitable because its our ticket to the next life that is eternal....Now, numerous people would read this and still not come to terms with its inherent truth. Dreams and our subconscious states that we can over recall is proof of the existence of our souls.... "And it is he who takes your souls by night and knows what you have committed by day. Then he revives you therein {by day} that a specified term may be fulfilled. Then to him will be your return; then he will inform you about what you used to do." Qur'an 6:60 Mankind is upon the worst conditions in regards to themselves...People are insignificant to profit and desensitized to the value of life by countless killings and War. More people have died in the last 100yrs than ever before in human history. These genocides have been mainly carried out in colonizing and bring the world under subjection of the ruling state(s). Now historically, going back through the ages of humanity, all peoples have always held a belief in a higher power which is usually also proven archaeologically as well when we examine the ruins of there remains. However, whenever mankind has fallen into idol worship and multiple gods in worships those civilizations have been utterly destroyed. In the past 150-200 yrs in the making we have witnessed for the first time purely atheistic states influenced into disbelief (such as Old Soviet Union & Viet Nam). As for Russia it would take much more time in explaining her defeat into disbelief, but take the task upon yourself to read about the Bolshevik revolution....You will learn Stalin and many other high rank Russians were actually Jewish and that communism was actually a conspired plot into taking the once super-power on its course to collapse. Today, Russia has regained her strong Orthodox christian beliefs, passing laws against same sex marriage and other atrocities the west has seemed to embrace which go completely against scriptural text. Darwin-ism was another fundamental principle of atheistic views that quickly took root in the west, and although the church remained, its views politically and then scientifically seemed to trump spiritual belief. For them science has always paved the way to revelation anyway, and since everything was re-written according to man it was very easy to find faults in scripture while at the same time promote the new logic of Darwin's natural selection. These ideas legitimized the ideals of colonization and servitude of the weaker or subdued and thus the world has been held tightly according to these views for the past 100 yrs. So, what's next? Well its my opinion that what's up next is already upon humanity...As the shackles of the last 100yrs continue to rust & weather from the salt of lies and down pouring of tears of dissatisfied peoples across the world; new stages of a planned transition have been set in motion. The perceived economic failures, and social unrest has all been in order to subdue people towards an agenda that collectively seeks to corral the masses to control by mechanisms. As the physical shackles of old dogma are debunked scientifically, and orally delivered with eloquence in truth the world is again shifting its views. 911 initiated an international event in leading this world into a very dark corner never before witnessed by human kind in history, but at the same time it has been countered with undeniable surfacing of the truth. You see, before 911 the international community has never been so openly confronted with the Quran, and its truths as well as the Sunnah of the Prophet Muhammad s.a.w....Now, before any of you think that everything written thus far was actually a ploy to pitch Islam to you...I beg of you to continue to read, because on the contrary Islam has already been piped into everyone's existence by the same forces who have planned to break it. The west, mainly America was virtually kept in the dark about Islam prior...Unless people lived in or near cities with Arab populations they were not exposed to it. Or, old enough to remember the days of Malcolm X and his vast delivery of very blunt and brilliant speeches, then speaking for the Nation of Islam. People were un-taken nor were they properly introduced to the last Prophet s.a.w. The Nation of Islam, although it has had its place (or has it...you be the judge in measuring any progress by their hand towards black peoples in America) in black politics towards injustices, it has very badly distorted the face of Islam towards all ethnicity in America from its nationalistic & racial speeches...The purity of Islam as it is so, and maintained, unchanged in the tongue of the last prophet Muhammad s.a.w. in the Arabic language... Now, distortions historically were always done for a reason and if you read my page entitled "THE PLOT", you will begin to understand some of those many well disguised agendas. Divisions have been humanities public enemy #1 and so, it has always been & continues to be the main exploitation. Psychological advancements have help to apply technology into the deception by cleverly manipulating the psyche of the masses of people by the use of television and all of its subliminal, encoding that teach the subconscious mind through cognitive branches of emotion, belief, and thinking....Most people think and act according to their favorite sitcoms that give them their new views on the modern family...the same goes for teenage folk as well...which has reduced the parent to companions & friends completely erasing the lines of respect and grandeur.
Differences that could be so easily eradicated if properly researched... I have been told by very dear friend that there are alot of people in search for the truth....He has encourage me to continue to share my writings for it is finding an audience among those who search. The division is as thin as a line drawn in the sand... I ask any of you to consider some of the following ideals:
If anyone was to ponder over and research the following, you would see that that one difference exploited the most is actually something we have in common. |
AuthorSayyar Isma'il...What people gamble with today is eternity and the divisions that are exploited one would come to know through search are actually commonality.... ArchivesCategories |