American history often heard or explained in definition to derivative as "His-Story", is proving to be just that...Someone's or better relevant to a group, hell bent on under-minding the truth about history. American history, from what is understood by the masses of most people in and outside of America as been basically told from the onslaught of the first European refugees then fleeing from the Christian Church of England. These early newcomers to America, arriving in Boston, in a place noted as "Plymouth Rock". These new immigrants would encounter an already existing established society. The rest of the narrative is basically understood that genocide occurred in destroying these people and overtaking the land.
In a nut-shell this is pretty much the details of American history told and taught in American classrooms... But is this actually American history? The answer is no...and cover-ups are being unmasked in their efforts to covering up the truth. If you really sit down & anaylze the matter what you'll find is distortion of events and people along the timeline. In American history black peoples have always been regarded to in terms of slavery; while Indians were given tribute of "indigenous" origins due to mass genocide that even their own story can't hide...Truth of the matter is blacks have always been present during and prior to their story. Present in every American campaign in winning its independence and already present in November of 1620 when the first pilgrims arrived. History from their perspective is full of wholes both deliberate and unknown...their history begins with the Greco Roman calendar denoted by the B.C. and A.D. system. The B.C. (before Christ) is dully noted by most people, however the A.D. doesn't stand for After Death (for Christ) as they would have you to believe. It actually means anno domini which translates too "(“in the year of our the Lord)". But for now lets pause on that notion and go to some interesting facts about early history.
American Narcotics Discovered in Egyptian MummiesThe discovery of American narcotics in Egyptian mummies has left some historians amazed. Recently, archaeologists discovered the presence of narcotics only known to be derived from American plants in ancient Egyptian mummies. These substances included South American cocaine from Erythroxylon and nicotine from Nicotiana tabacum. German toxicologist Svetla Balabanova reported the findings, which suggest that such compounds made their way to Africa through trans-Atlantic trade that would predate Columbus’ arrival by thousands of years... For years, Eurocentric archaeologists have largely turned the other cheek when it came to the discovery of artifacts from ancient Egypt being discovered in the Americas. According to Dr. David Imhotep, the author behind the book “The First Americans Were Africans": Documented Evidence, “Egyptian artifacts found across North America from the Algonquin writings on the East Coast to the artifacts and Egyptian place names in the Grand Canyon” are all signs of an early arrival in the Americas by Africans. This is also paired with a much earlier account of Black people with incredible skills at sea. Back in 445 B.C., the Greek historian Herodotus wrote of King Ramses III leading a team of Africans at sea with astounding seafaring and navigational skills. Together, both accounts would point to Africans sailing over to the New World before Columbus. [AtlantaBlackStar, Wednesday, November 11th, 2015].
The Pacific Ocean and its vastness are pretty much self explanatory and understood that it has remained the primary body of water on earth, but as for other bodies they were created by land rifts that opened up and began to spread apart.
For example: the distance now between continents happened over a long period of time. Intially maybe only minutes, or hours to cross then increases into days, weeks, & months...That history would have given those who set out a surety in what they were embarking on instead of an expedition into the unknown abyss of the open Ocean. Again, noting the prior given testimony of the Greek historian: "Back in 445 B.C., the Greek historian Herodotus wrote of King Ramses III leading a team of Africans at sea with astounding seafaring and navigational skills." If they had prior knowledge and then also become experts of navigation making use of the stars, they would then appear to others has some of a phenom when accompanied by new comers. So, lets revisit that early point about the calendar notations of B.C. & A.D.. Anno donnlini as explained "in the year of our Lord"; but whose Lord and in who do they refer? Well, the story has an interesting robbery of character and images that are also applied to Jesus and other figures whom also carry the same story applied to himself and that of their mothers throughout pagan culture. For more of those details visit my page "Modern day Paganism" by clicking this button below after your done reading. But brief to explain the theory and findings behind this A.D. dialogue date back to the Roman occupation of Egypt and what is known to be the first Non-Egyptian Pharoah. The man known has "Sarapus" came to power, but like all Pharoahs before him, he too wanted to be seen & taken as a "god". So, the church builds an image and story around him that predates that of the time of Jesus a.s.. This figure was them attributed with a new setting of time in history noted by A.D. in the year of our Lord, which their Lord (the pagans) was none other than this figure. This figure was them attached to the true Eesa ibn Mariam a.s. (Jesus) and taught according from a now dogmatic perceptive with altered text, and historical meaning. So, lets connect some of the dots...This A.D. concepts begins with the year "Zero" basically counting backward from now is only 2015 years; while B.C. goes negative for millions or billions of years... Carbon dating notes age to the earth, trees, fossils, sea floor, etc. but the oldest known fossils of modern humans have been discovered in Herto, Ethiopia. An international team led by researchers from the University of California, Berkeley, found the skulls of two adults and a child dating from 160,000 years ago. Now, most everyone today knows that Jesus (Eesa ibn Mariam a.s.) wasn't born on December 25th, and his exact birthday is also not known...We can also deduce the same for Adam & Hawah (Eve) that the precise time for them on the earth is unknown, but that it must pre-date the oldest found fossils of human beings. In fact it is now easy to begin to see this deliberate "white-washing" of history, and its applied secularist methods in re-teaching history to an indigenous people stripped of their past. Legislation has long been used up until this day of emperors, kings, presidents, and collaborating governments to bury the truth while they in turn write themselves into history. New evidences of early human habitation are constantly being found, a few sites have produced dates of human habitation as early as 50,000 years ago and more. Sites such as Pedra Furada - Brazil, Monte Verde - Chile, and Fells cave in Tierra del Fuego - Chile, are enabling us to paint a new, and more complete picture, of the early history of the Western Hemisphere...
The Christian account in Genesis doesn't agree with science and the known traits that creation is brought about in terms of things that grow/ life of organisms and thereby sustained. This is in no way to poke fun at those who follow the faith, but instead should help to point out the atrocities in question that have purposely been put there to distort history and truth. For example: Just two of many scientific distortions...
Most people understand this to mean the creation of the atmosphere. And read as such it makes sense. Except for the pesky fact that without a source of heat, such as the sun, and with no air pressure, such as the lack of an atmosphere, water can not remain in a liquid state. Water in such an environment would rapidly boil, turning to gas, then instantly freeze turning to ice crystals. This would have already happened on the first day when this water was created. So at this point to speak of “water” would be illogical.
The reason I brought the talk of the bible into this subject matter is because since the earliest accounts of slavery in America 1554, but historically they would rather the date be in compliance to the arrival of the pilgrims to suggest one not here before the other besides the Indians whose history they don't understand at all; they have used religion as a way to further mask the truth in identity to a people with a long history that dates back to the beginning. As black Christians black people are effectively claiming the conversion of religion to their former slave masters and thus forfeiting their rights of being indigenous. This in turn offers you know legals rights under the Constitution because it only applies to citizens, thus by maintaining this immigrant status the people are disenfranchised often unknowingly so. This is a clever trick, that has been propagated by the continuation of Christianity towards blacks in America, and further perpetuated today by mega-churches and their clergy. This is the point where history plays a huge role. NOT all black peoples came from Africa during Trans-atlantic slave trade, but those who did verses those who didn't who are they? That's where your own research would help fill in the void. Slaveries story is actually told in reverse so that today the blacks in America still see themselves as immigrants who were brought to the land instead of, in alot of cases, already being there. This is why if one is lucky enough to do so, will find that their family records may end in the beginning years of slavery without an ancestor who ties them back to Africa, because they would be from ancestry already in America. A reason for this is, the Indians who primary exist on prisoner of War camps (is how the government recognizes them), but said in a moderate fashion of politeness; they are sovereign which gives them an autonomy of self-governance and detachment from the USA government. The black man if he came into the truth about his own history collectively too would have the option in declaring what history has denied him, and thus subjected him too. This is a very crucial factor something that deserves the biggest & brightest of peoples to further carry the torch... The Black Washitaw of Louisiana were documented by the French and Spanish to be one of the Black nations who existed in the Mississippi Valley and the Southern/Midwestern U.S. before the Louisiana Purchase in 1805, in which France sold their lands without their consent...The USA would later go on to lose its case against the family. So, what does this all have to do with anything? Well, all of these parcels are part of a larger picture broken up with all its pieces scattered about. This blog will only serve to provoke your thirst to further hunt along this path I have set you on towards all of the documented proofs and truths. Caves or Caverns in Illinois, to the agriculture land plots shaped in the form of a bird in Louisiana, to the hidden archaeological finds of Egyptian remains in America already mentioned. The book, "A History of the Affrican-Olmecs," details the feelings of the descendants of the Black Washitaw Nation, who still live in the Southern U.S. to this very day. My own ancestry derives from these native peoples. I say that because i was fortunate to speak to my grandparents in the south before they passed away. Grandfather from Haiti, and Grandmother from Indian descent (with Indian facial features, and very long hair), they resided in Georgia, before my mother migrated to the North. My Grandfathers family primarily lived in Louisiana which the struggles against the french in Haiti, also played pivotol roles in destroying the port of New Orleans which was helping to fund the confederate south with exports to cotton to Europe... In retrospect, the book "A History of the African-Olmecs: Black civilizations of America from Prehistoric Times to the Present Era," is a treasure to behold. Anyone who is confused about the history of the United States and the entire Americas before Columbus should read this facinating book with a large number of references and written in a very professional style. The book, A History of the African-Olmecs, pub. by 1stBooks Library, Bloomington, Indiana U.S.A., examines the contributions of Old World Peoples to the Americas such as Africans, Chinese, Europeans, Middle Easterners, Africoid Melanesians, Africoid Australians, Japanese, Polynesians and others. It provides the once hidden facts about the great contributions made by Africans to the development of culture in the Americas thousands of years before Columbus. [http://www.nairaland.com/1212037/africans-discovered-america-thousands-years]
Sovereignty escapes by immigration Status 11/11/2015
American history often heard or explained in definition to derivative as "His-Story", is proving to be just that...Someone's or better relevant to a group, hell bent on under-minding the truth about history. American history, from what is understood by the masses of most people in and outside of America as been basically told from the onslaught of the first European refugees then fleeing from the Christian Church of England. These early newcomers to America, arriving in Boston, in a place noted as "Plymouth Rock". These new immigrants would encounter an already existing established society. The rest of the narrative is basically understood that genocide occurred in destroying these people and overtaking the land.
In a nut-shell this is pretty much the details of American history told and taught in American classrooms... But is this actually American history? The answer is no...and cover-ups are being unmasked in their efforts to covering up the truth. If you really sit down & anaylze the matter what you'll find is distortion of events and people along the timeline. In American history black peoples have always been regarded to in terms of slavery; while Indians were given tribute of "indigenous" origins due to mass genocide that even their own story can't hide...Truth of the matter is blacks have always been present during and prior to their story. Present in every American campaign in winning its independence and already present in November of 1620 when the first pilgrims arrived. History from their perspective is full of wholes both deliberate and unknown...their history begins with the Greco Roman calendar denoted by the B.C. and A.D. system. The B.C. (before Christ) is dully noted by most people, however the A.D. doesn't stand for After Death (for Christ) as they would have you to believe. It actually means anno domini which translates too "(“in the year of our the Lord)". But for now lets pause on that notion and go to some interesting facts about early history. According to renowned American historian and linguist Leo Weiner of Harvard University, one of the strongest pieces of evidence to support the fact that Black people sailed to America before Christopher Columbus was a journal entry from Columbus himself. In Weiner’s book, “Africa and the Discovery of America,” he explains that Columbus noted in his journal that the Native Americans confirmed “black skinned people had come from the south-east in boats, trading in gold-tipped spears.” American Narcotics Discovered in Egyptian MummiesThe discovery of American narcotics in Egyptian mummies has left some historians amazed. Recently, archaeologists discovered the presence of narcotics only known to be derived from American plants in ancient Egyptian mummies. These substances included South American cocaine from Erythroxylon and nicotine from Nicotiana tabacum. German toxicologist Svetla Balabanova reported the findings, which suggest that such compounds made their way to Africa through trans-Atlantic trade that would predate Columbus’ arrival by thousands of years... For years, Eurocentric archaeologists have largely turned the other cheek when it came to the discovery of artifacts from ancient Egypt being discovered in the Americas. According to Dr. David Imhotep, the author behind the book “The First Americans Were Africans": Documented Evidence, “Egyptian artifacts found across North America from the Algonquin writings on the East Coast to the artifacts and Egyptian place names in the Grand Canyon” are all signs of an early arrival in the Americas by Africans. This is also paired with a much earlier account of Black people with incredible skills at sea. Back in 445 B.C., the Greek historian Herodotus wrote of King Ramses III leading a team of Africans at sea with astounding seafaring and navigational skills. Together, both accounts would point to Africans sailing over to the New World before Columbus. [AtlantaBlackStar, Wednesday, November 11th, 2015]. Moving back in time, its also historically known that the land was once one, solid land mass they refer by name "Pangaea (sometimes spelled Pangea), the most recent of a series of super-continents on Earth, formed about 270 million years ago and broke apart about 200 million years ago". From the depiction in the video of the expanding earth which explains the rift of the movement of continents. The Pacific Ocean and its vastness are pretty much self explanatory and understood that it has remained the primary body of water on earth, but as for other bodies they were created by land rifts that opened up and began to spread apart.
For example: the distance now between continents happened over a long period of time. Intially maybe only minutes, or hours to cross then increases into days, weeks, & months...That history would have given those who set out a surety in what they were embarking on instead of an expedition into the unknown abyss of the open Ocean. Again, noting the prior given testimony of the Greek historian: "Back in 445 B.C., the Greek historian Herodotus wrote of King Ramses III leading a team of Africans at sea with astounding seafaring and navigational skills." If they had prior knowledge and then also become experts of navigation making use of the stars, they would then appear to others has some of a phenom when accompanied by new comers. This Map of Ocean currents explains why later African sailors as well as Columbus always tended to land south towards the Caribbean and Gulf of Mexico. Solely at the mercy of the currents and winds for 2-3 month journey's in crossing... So, lets revisit that early point about the calendar notations of B.C. & A.D.. Anno donnlini as explained "in the year of our Lord"; but whose Lord and in who do they refer? Well, the story has an interesting robbery of character and images that are also applied to Jesus and other figures whom also carry the same story applied to himself and that of their mothers throughout pagan culture. For more of those details visit my page "Modern day Paganism" by clicking this button below after your done reading. But brief to explain the theory and findings behind this A.D. dialogue date back to the Roman occupation of Egypt and what is known to be the first Non-Egyptian Pharoah. The man known has "Sarapus" came to power, but like all Pharoahs before him, he too wanted to be seen & taken as a "god". So, the church builds an image and story around him that predates that of the time of Jesus a.s.. This figure was them attributed with a new setting of time in history noted by A.D. in the year of our Lord, which their Lord (the pagans) was none other than this figure. modern paganism applied This figure was them attached to the true Eesa ibn Mariam a.s. (Jesus) and taught according from a now dogmatic perceptive with altered text, and historical meaning. So, lets connect some of the dots...This A.D. concepts begins with the year "Zero" basically counting backward from now is only 2015 years; while B.C. goes negative for millions or billions of years... Carbon dating notes age to the earth, trees, fossils, sea floor, etc. but the oldest known fossils of modern humans have been discovered in Herto, Ethiopia. An international team led by researchers from the University of California, Berkeley, found the skulls of two adults and a child dating from 160,000 years ago. Now, most everyone today knows that Jesus (Eesa ibn Mariam a.s.) wasn't born on December 25th, and his exact birthday is also not known...We can also deduce the same for Adam & Hawah (Eve) that the precise time for them on the earth is unknown, but that it must pre-date the oldest found fossils of human beings. In fact it is now easy to begin to see this deliberate "white-washing" of history, and its applied secularist methods in re-teaching history to an indigenous people stripped of their past. Legislation has long been used up until this day of emperors, kings, presidents, and collaborating governments to bury the truth while they in turn write themselves into history. New evidences of early human habitation are constantly being found, a few sites have produced dates of human habitation as early as 50,000 years ago and more. Sites such as Pedra Furada - Brazil, Monte Verde - Chile, and Fells cave in Tierra del Fuego - Chile, are enabling us to paint a new, and more complete picture, of the early history of the Western Hemisphere... The Christian account in Genesis doesn't agree with science and the known traits that creation is brought about in terms of things that grow/ life of organisms and thereby sustained. This is in no way to poke fun at those who follow the faith, but instead should help to point out the atrocities in question that have purposely been put there to distort history and truth. For example: Just two of many scientific distortions...
Most people understand this to mean the creation of the atmosphere. And read as such it makes sense. Except for the pesky fact that without a source of heat, such as the sun, and with no air pressure, such as the lack of an atmosphere, water can not remain in a liquid state. Water in such an environment would rapidly boil, turning to gas, then instantly freeze turning to ice crystals. This would have already happened on the first day when this water was created. So at this point to speak of “water” would be illogical.
The reason I brought the talk of the bible into this subject matter is because since the earliest accounts of slavery in America 1554, but historically they would rather the date be in compliance to the arrival of the pilgrims to suggest one not here before the other besides the Indians whose history they don't understand at all; they have used religion as a way to further mask the truth in identity to a people with a long history that dates back to the beginning. As black Christians black people are effectively claiming the conversion of religion to their former slave masters and thus forfeiting their rights of being indigenous. This in turn offers you know legals rights under the Constitution because it only applies to citizens, thus by maintaining this immigrant status the people are disenfranchised often unknowingly so. This is a clever trick, that has been propagated by the continuation of Christianity towards blacks in America, and further perpetuated today by mega-churches and their clergy. This is the point where history plays a huge role. NOT all black peoples came from Africa during Trans-atlantic slave trade, but those who did verses those who didn't who are they? That's where your own research would help fill in the void. Slaveries story is actually told in reverse so that today the blacks in America still see themselves as immigrants who were brought to the land instead of, in alot of cases, already being there. This is why if one is lucky enough to do so, will find that their family records may end in the beginning years of slavery without an ancestor who ties them back to Africa, because they would be from ancestry already in America. A reason for this is, the Indians who primary exist on prisoner of War camps (is how the government recognizes them), but said in a moderate fashion of politeness; they are sovereign which gives them an autonomy of self-governance and detachment from the USA government. The black man if he came into the truth about his own history collectively too would have the option in declaring what history has denied him, and thus subjected him too. This is a very crucial factor something that deserves the biggest & brightest of peoples to further carry the torch... The Black Washitaw of Louisiana were documented by the French and Spanish to be one of the Black nations who existed in the Mississippi Valley and the Southern/Midwestern U.S. before the Louisiana Purchase in 1805, in which France sold their lands without their consent...The USA would later go on to lose its case against the family. So, what does this all have to do with anything? Well, all of these parcels are part of a larger picture broken up with all its pieces scattered about. This blog will only serve to provoke your thirst to further hunt along this path I have set you on towards all of the documented proofs and truths. Caves or Caverns in Illinois, to the agriculture land plots shaped in the form of a bird in Louisiana, to the hidden archaeological finds of Egyptian remains in America already mentioned. The book, "A History of the Affrican-Olmecs," details the feelings of the descendants of the Black Washitaw Nation, who still live in the Southern U.S. to this very day. My own ancestry derives from these native peoples. I say that because i was fortunate to speak to my grandparents in the south before they passed away. Grandfather from Haiti, and Grandmother from Indian descent (with Indian facial features, and very long hair), they resided in Georgia, before my mother migrated to the North. My Grandfathers family primarily lived in Louisiana which the struggles against the french in Haiti, also played pivotol roles in destroying the port of New Orleans which was helping to fund the confederate south with exports to cotton to Europe... In retrospect, the book "A History of the African-Olmecs: Black civilizations of America from Prehistoric Times to the Present Era," is a treasure to behold. Anyone who is confused about the history of the United States and the entire Americas before Columbus should read this facinating book with a large number of references and written in a very professional style. The book, A History of the African-Olmecs, pub. by 1stBooks Library, Bloomington, Indiana U.S.A., examines the contributions of Old World Peoples to the Americas such as Africans, Chinese, Europeans, Middle Easterners, Africoid Melanesians, Africoid Australians, Japanese, Polynesians and others. It provides the once hidden facts about the great contributions made by Africans to the development of culture in the Americas thousands of years before Columbus. [http://www.nairaland.com/1212037/africans-discovered-america-thousands-years] Sovereignty....7/14/2015 0 Comments A DOCUMENTARY I PRODUCED ON THE TOPIC,..WHEN TIME PERMITS PLEASE HAVE A LOOK...“Sovereignty itself is, of course, not subject to law for it is the author and source of law;” [Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886)] “There is no such thing as a power of inherent Sovereignty in the government of the United States. In this country sovereignty resides in the People, and Congress can exercise no power which they have not, by their Constitution entrusted to it: All else is withheld.” [Juilliard v. Greenman, 110 U.S. 421 (1884)] The concept of the Sovereignty of the people is well supported by court cases, presidential quotes, a book published by the United States Congress and other sources. First the courts cases... "The Congress cannot revoke the Sovereign power of the people to override their will as thus declared.”Perry v. United States, (1935), 294US 330, 353 "In the United States, Sovereignty resides in the people, who act through the organs established by the Constitution." Chisholm v. Georgia, 2 Dall 419, 471; Penhallow v Doane's Administrators, 3 Dall 54, 93; McCullock v Maryland, 4 Wheat 316, 404, 405; Yick Yo Hopkins, 118 US 356, 370. "What is a Constitution? It is the form of government, delineated to the mighty hand of the people, in which certain first principles of fundamental laws are established." Van Horne v. Dorrance, 2 Dall 304 "Strictly speaking, in our republican form government, the absolute sovereignty of the n ation is in the people of the nation; and the residuary sovereignty of each state, NOT GRANTED to any of its public functionaries, is in the people of the state, " 2 Dall 471; Bouvier's Law Dictionary , (1870). "The theory of the American political system is that the ultimate sovereignty is in the people, from whom all legitimate authority springs, and the people collectively, acting through the medium of constitutions, create such governmental agencies, endow them with such powers, and subject them to such limitations as in their wisdom will best promote the common good.”First Trust Co v. Smith, 227 SW 762. "A constitution is designated as a supreme enactment, a fundamental act of legislation by the people of the state. A constitution is legislation direct from the people acting in their sovereign capacity, while a statute is legislation from their representatives, subject to limitations prescribed by the superior authority. "Ellingham v Dye, 321 US 250; Sage v. New York, 47 NE 1096 Take note of the last statement of the last quote. The legislation by the peoples' representatives is subject to the limitation prescribed by the superior authority. That authority is the Constitution. This is also supported by California. Jurisprudence 3d. In volume 13, we read beginning in section 223, on page 396 the following: "When civil rights are recognized, and declared in the constitutions, they are not thereby granted or created, but are merely guaranteed against federal and state impairment." On page 401 of the California Jurisprudence 3d, Volume 13: "It has been pointed out that the Declaration of Rights differs from the great English charters in that it is not an assurance to the individual from a sovereign, but is a command and a limitation of power on state officials BY THE PEOPLE WHO CREATED THE FORMAL GOVERNMENT. These sections imply possible oppression and ARE DESIGNED TO ENABLE THE VICTIM TO ASSERT HIS RIGHTS, EVEN AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT". Citing Begerow, In re 133 C 349, 65 P. 828 (emphasis added). This clearly states the Sovereignty of the individual, "the victim," to hold the government accountable for violations of his rights. If government is held accountable to the individual, then government IS NOT sovereign and the individual IS Sovereign. "Constitutional rights may not be infringed simply because the majority of the people choose that they be. Nor may a constitutional prohibition to transgress indirectly by the creation of a statutory presumption anymore than it can be violated by direct enactment; the power to create presumptions IS NOT A MEANS of escape from constitutional restriction." "There have been powerful hydraulic pressures throughout our history that bear heavily on the court water down constitutional guarantees and give the police the upper hand. That hydraulic pressure has probably never been greater than it is today. YET IF THE INDIVIDUAL IS NO LONGER TO BE SOVEREIGN, if the police can pick him up whenever they do not like the cut of his jib if they can "seize” and "search" him at their discretion, WE ENTER A NEW REGIME. The decision to enter it should be made only after a full debate by the people of this country."Terry v. Ohio (1967), 392 US 39. (Emphasis added) Simply, the government is limited in power and authority in their responsibility. They CANNOT act outside the Constitution because the Constitution gave them only limited authority and power. As stated, just because they can create legislation, they cannot supersede or escape the constitutionally mandated restrictions. UNDERSTAND THIS! There is in fact a push in government to do away with the Constitution. "Many Americans have a wrong conception of what their state legislature is supposed to be. They look upon it as a sort of secondary lawmaking body which concerns itself mainly with minor questions that are not of sufficient importance to engage the attention of Congress. "The citizen should take more interest in his state legislature. He should be more concerned about its personnel and powers. For this body, to a greater extent than Congress, determines his political privileges and his immediate relationships. It regulates his civil rights and duties, secures him in the tenure of his property, and makes most of the rules that govern his daily movements. To do these things efficiently it is essential that the state legislature be properly organized, truly representative, UNHAMPERED BY NEEDLESS CONSTITUTIONAL RESTRICTIONS, and endowed with adequate authority. " Congressional book published in 1937. In this published by Congress called The Story of the Constitution, the issue of sovereignty is discussed. On pages 31-33 under Part III we read: The first three words of the Constitution “WE THE PEOPLE” declares by what authority the United States of America is ruled. Having won their liberty and independence by force of arms, and having experienced distress and danger because of an imperfect union, the people finally succeeded in forming the more perfect Union which is ordained and established by the Constitution. "The liberties enjoyed by Englishmen were wrested from the Crown. The American colonist claimed these liberties as their inheritance, and won by force of arms, the final right to them and to further ones which had been fostered by the conditions of the colonial governments. The government of the United States IS NOT a concession to the people from someone higher up. It is the creation and the creature of the people themselves, as ABSOLUTE SOVEREIGNS." Please note two statements. The first is "(T)he government of the United States IS NOT a concession to the people from someone higher up." This clearly states there is something or someone higher than government. The second statement identifies who is over the government, the people. Their position is one of absolute sovereignty and is plural in form, not a singular form. That the people are sovereign means the people all together form sovereignty. "... The people themselves (plural), as absolute sovereigns (plural)" meaning each natural born person holds the position of a sovereign. This is also pointed out in the last case (Terry v. Ohio (1967), 392 US 39 "If the individual is no longer to be sovereign..." Frederick Cook Moorehouse (1868-1932) presented the problem in its truest form in his work “The Problem of Democracy.” In that work he stated... “The problem of democracy is not the problem of getting rid of kings. It is the problem of clothing the whole people with the elements of kingship. To make kings and queens out of a hundred million people [(Or be it the population in question)]; that is the problem of American democracy... We follow this by a quotation from a retiring president, James K Polk, who served only one term. When he retired from the Presidential Office in 1849, he made a very clear and concise statement on the sovereignty of the individual. "I now retire as a servant and regain my position as a sovereign." |
AuthorSovereignty is a God give birth right and the drafters of the Constitution tried their best in creating a living document that would apply for all time in acknowledging those rights... ArchivesCategories |